<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late Start</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evilspeculator.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=12722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722</link>
	<description>bent on market domination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ultra</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-232481</link>
		<dc:creator>ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-232481</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the charts, gmak. Like the TD pressure oscillator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;the intra-day movement is just noise&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree on this point - this is where I think Elliott &lt;b&gt;can&lt;/b&gt; give you an edge. Twice now in the last few weeks, I&#039;ve been able to pretty much dismiss the much-fabled scenario earlier than many based on the Elliott wave structure. Even if I did get a bit overexcited first. The second of these cases was based on Elliott count on an intraday 1 min chart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, for me at least, what I see leads me to believe that no matter what the manipulation going on, if you look at enough (or maybe just the right) charts, then the market will give you enough of a signature to recognise what is probably - or, just as valuable, probably &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; - going on. If you&#039;re not too blind or blinkered to see it that is. This last bit I am constantly working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the charts, gmak. Like the TD pressure oscillator.</p>
<p><em>the intra-day movement is just noise</em></p>
<p>I disagree on this point &#8211; this is where I think Elliott <b>can</b> give you an edge. Twice now in the last few weeks, I&#39;ve been able to pretty much dismiss the much-fabled scenario earlier than many based on the Elliott wave structure. Even if I did get a bit overexcited first. The second of these cases was based on Elliott count on an intraday 1 min chart.</p>
<p>So, for me at least, what I see leads me to believe that no matter what the manipulation going on, if you look at enough (or maybe just the right) charts, then the market will give you enough of a signature to recognise what is probably &#8211; or, just as valuable, probably <em>not</em> &#8211; going on. If you&#39;re not too blind or blinkered to see it that is. This last bit I am constantly working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultra</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175398</link>
		<dc:creator>ultra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 08:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175398</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the charts, gmak. Like the TD pressure oscillator.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;the intra-day movement is just noise&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I disagree on this point - this is where I think Elliott &lt;b&gt;can&lt;/b&gt; give you an edge. Twice now in the last few weeks, I&#039;ve been able to pretty much dismiss the much-fabled scenario earlier than many based on the Elliott wave structure. Even if I did get a bit overexcited first. The second of these cases was based on Elliott count on an intraday 1 min chart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, for me at least, what I see leads me to believe that no matter what the manipulation going on, if you look at enough (or maybe just the right) charts, then the market will give you enough of a signature to recognise what is probably - or, just as valuable, probably &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; - going on. If you&#039;re not too blind or blinkered to see it that is. This last bit I am constantly working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the charts, gmak. Like the TD pressure oscillator.</p>
<p><em>the intra-day movement is just noise</em></p>
<p>I disagree on this point &#8211; this is where I think Elliott <b>can</b> give you an edge. Twice now in the last few weeks, I&#39;ve been able to pretty much dismiss the much-fabled scenario earlier than many based on the Elliott wave structure. Even if I did get a bit overexcited first. The second of these cases was based on Elliott count on an intraday 1 min chart.</p>
<p>So, for me at least, what I see leads me to believe that no matter what the manipulation going on, if you look at enough (or maybe just the right) charts, then the market will give you enough of a signature to recognise what is probably &#8211; or, just as valuable, probably <em>not</em> &#8211; going on. If you&#39;re not too blind or blinkered to see it that is. This last bit I am constantly working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nightwind</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175354</link>
		<dc:creator>Nightwind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175354</guid>
		<description>I think EWI calls are 100% accurate on the fundamentals.   They just need to work on their technicals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think EWI calls are 100% accurate on the fundamentals.   They just need to work on their technicals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berkshire</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175341</link>
		<dc:creator>berkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175341</guid>
		<description>¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨&lt;br&gt;¨°º¤ø„¸ N E W „ø¤º°¨&lt;br&gt;¸„ø¤º°¨ P O S T ``°º¤ø„¸&lt;br&gt;¸„ø¤º°¨¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°º¤ø„¸&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12744#disqus_thread&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12744#disqus_thread&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Skål!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨<br />¨°º¤ø„¸ N E W „ø¤º°¨<br />¸„ø¤º°¨ P O S T &#8220;°º¤ø„¸<br />¸„ø¤º°¨¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°º¤ø„¸</p>
<p><a href="http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12744#disqus_thread" rel="nofollow">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12744#disqus_thread</a></p>
<p>Skål!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stainless_Steel_Hamster</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175340</link>
		<dc:creator>Stainless_Steel_Hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175340</guid>
		<description>I have said many times not only that EWT works, but I also mentioned my firm belief that it is the weapon of choice of the PPT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have said many times not only that EWT works, but I also mentioned my firm belief that it is the weapon of choice of the PPT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Publius Federali</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175339</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius Federali</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175339</guid>
		<description>Sorry, far from a pro at this.  My only point was that it appears that EW allows for market manipulation by the government and banksters.  There is ample room for the market to keep going higher under EW theory, that was my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, far from a pro at this.  My only point was that it appears that EW allows for market manipulation by the government and banksters.  There is ample room for the market to keep going higher under EW theory, that was my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stainless_Steel_Hamster</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175338</link>
		<dc:creator>Stainless_Steel_Hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175338</guid>
		<description>BTW, try ultraviolet upper through november 11 magenta, january green 9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, try ultraviolet upper through november 11 magenta, january green 9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stainless_Steel_Hamster</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175337</link>
		<dc:creator>Stainless_Steel_Hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175337</guid>
		<description>adn the signal that they&#039;re monetizing air would be gold close to 1500 (I agree on our market ronin&#039;s assessment on that one... BTW any news from him?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adn the signal that they&#39;re monetizing air would be gold close to 1500 (I agree on our market ronin&#39;s assessment on that one&#8230; BTW any news from him?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stainless_Steel_Hamster</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175336</link>
		<dc:creator>Stainless_Steel_Hamster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175336</guid>
		<description>&quot;the only thing written in stone is that we can not go above the Oct &#039;07 high.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;errrr... not realy, then 2007 was minor b and this top major B (to be followed by 5 waves down to probably (-0.61 beyond A=666) 111 if same taste for repeats and delta for B very close to b&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sorry  :-(&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;p.s. if I&#039;m saying something wrong, seasoned EWTers please correct me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the only thing written in stone is that we can not go above the Oct &#39;07 high.&#8221;</p>
<p>errrr&#8230; not realy, then 2007 was minor b and this top major B (to be followed by 5 waves down to probably (-0.61 beyond A=666) 111 if same taste for repeats and delta for B very close to b</p>
<p>sorry  <img src='http://evilspeculator.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>p.s. if I&#39;m saying something wrong, seasoned EWTers please correct me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmak</title>
		<link>http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722&#038;cpage=6#comment-175335</link>
		<dc:creator>gmak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evilspeculator.com/?p=12722#comment-175335</guid>
		<description>Possible on the Gold: SPX; but I think the limiting factor is the ability of the FED to monetize air. Once that ends, those doing God&#039;s work will bail, IMHO.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;________________________________</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possible on the Gold: SPX; but I think the limiting factor is the ability of the FED to monetize air. Once that ends, those doing God&#39;s work will bail, IMHO.</p>
<p>________________________________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
