Comments on: ISEE Red Candles http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099 bent on market domination Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:34:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Bankster http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-231135 Bankster Tue, 01 Dec 2009 23:45:45 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-231135 Shorts getting killed today. Could sure use your wave-count to know where the hell this is going. SPX at 1112. Fuuuuck my life. Shorts getting killed today. Could sure use your wave-count to know where the hell this is going. SPX at 1112. Fuuuuck my life.

]]> By: Bankster http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-181345 Bankster Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:45:45 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-181345 Shorts getting killed today. Could sure use your wave-count to know where the hell this is going. SPX at 1112. Fuuuuck my life. Shorts getting killed today. Could sure use your wave-count to know where the hell this is going. SPX at 1112. Fuuuuck my life.

]]> By: Teich50 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180451 Teich50 Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:32:15 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180451 fa_q booked 30k ES points of profits while posting his trades in real time. What have you done? As they say, money talks but bull$hit walks. fa_q booked 30k ES points of profits while posting his trades in real time. What have you done? As they say, money talks but bull$hit walks.

]]> By: fresbee http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180419 fresbee Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:36:49 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180419 cool stuff<br><br>but S&P if going to 1170 by dec....as usual people are getting bearish ...and bulls always climb the worry wall.<br><br>fresbee<br><A href="http://www.investingcontrarian.com" rel="nofollow"> INVESTING CONTRARIAN </a><br><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/investingcontrarian/BbCo" rel="nofollow"> Updates RSS </a></A> cool stuff

but S&P if going to 1170 by dec….as usual people are getting bearish …and bulls always climb the worry wall.

fresbee
INVESTING CONTRARIAN
Updates RSS

]]> By: raised_by_wolves http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180386 raised_by_wolves Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:57:35 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180386 Looks like you issued the warning on behalf of master. Looks like you issued the warning on behalf of master.

]]> By: Stainless_Steel_Hamster http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180380 Stainless_Steel_Hamster Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:32:45 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180380 AMEN<br><br>cub, care to check what I had to say about that? AMEN

cub, care to check what I had to say about that?

]]> By: raised_by_wolves http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180372 raised_by_wolves Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:03:40 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180372 The main draw is Mole's charts and commentary. That's our turkey, potatoes, ham, and yams. We lose something if Fa_q doesn't come back, but that's like going without the cranberry sauce. Maybe that's a deal breaker for you, but it's not for most of us.<br><br>About this business of banning Bob, doesn't he meet Mole's "say what you think and why" criteria? When Bob was 100 plus percent long, he gave reasons why. In addition to Mole's "say why" criteria, which I think Bob passes, there's the question of etiquette. If Mole were to give Bob a fail, he would probably also flunk Fa_q. Even though I would suggest that Mole warn them both (as he has graciously done for me in the past) and ban neither of them at this point, I'm content to let Mole decide whatever Mole's going to decide since Mole's the decider. The main draw is Mole's charts and commentary. That's our turkey, potatoes, ham, and yams. We lose something if Fa_q doesn't come back, but that's like going without the cranberry sauce. Maybe that's a deal breaker for you, but it's not for most of us.

About this business of banning Bob, doesn't he meet Mole's “say what you think and why” criteria? When Bob was 100 plus percent long, he gave reasons why. In addition to Mole's “say why” criteria, which I think Bob passes, there's the question of etiquette. If Mole were to give Bob a fail, he would probably also flunk Fa_q. Even though I would suggest that Mole warn them both (as he has graciously done for me in the past) and ban neither of them at this point, I'm content to let Mole decide whatever Mole's going to decide since Mole's the decider.

]]> By: raised_by_wolves http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180368 raised_by_wolves Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:53:06 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180368 The main draw is Mole's charts and commentary. That's our turkey, potatoes, ham, and yams. We lose something if Fa_q doesn't come back, but that's like going without the cranberry sauce. Maybe that's a deal breaker for you, but it's not for most of us.<br><br>About this business of banning Bob, doesn't he meet Mole's "say what you think and why" criteria? When Bob was 100 plus percent long, he gave reasons why. In addition to Mole's "say why" criteria, which I think Bob passes, there's the question of etiquette. If Mole were to give Bob a fail, he would probably also flunk Fa_q. Even though I would suggest that Mole warn them both (as he has graciously done for me in the past) and ban neither of them at this point, I'm content to let Mole decide whatever Mole's going to decide since Mole's the decider. The main draw is Mole's charts and commentary. That's our turkey, potatoes, ham, and yams. We lose something if Fa_q doesn't come back, but that's like going without the cranberry sauce. Maybe that's a deal breaker for you, but it's not for most of us.

About this business of banning Bob, doesn't he meet Mole's “say what you think and why” criteria? When Bob was 100 plus percent long, he gave reasons why. In addition to Mole's “say why” criteria, which I think Bob passes, there's the question of etiquette. If Mole were to give Bob a fail, he would probably also flunk Fa_q. Even though I would suggest that Mole warn them both (as he has graciously done for me in the past) and ban neither of them at this point, I'm content to let Mole decide whatever Mole's going to decide since Mole's the decider.

]]> By: Cypherd http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180357 Cypherd Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:28:38 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180357 Excellent work Mole, this is an indicator I like quite a bit. Excellent work Mole, this is an indicator I like quite a bit.

]]> By: Have No Fear | the evil speculator - one nefarious trade at a time http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099&cpage=4#comment-180272 Have No Fear | the evil speculator - one nefarious trade at a time Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:25:00 +0000 http://evilspeculator.com/?p=13099#comment-180272 [...] gyrations - focus on the longer term picture. And for that you might want to take a peek at my ISEE related post yesterday. Yes, that’s right - while you rats were tripping out on tryptophan I was working [...] [...] gyrations – focus on the longer term picture. And for that you might want to take a peek at my ISEE related post yesterday. Yes, that’s right – while you rats were tripping out on tryptophan I was working [...]

]]>